Disclosure consistency between Future Fund and super funds needed

19 October 2021
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) is calling on the Government to bring portfolio holdings disclosure obligations for Australian superannuation funds into line with proposed Future Funds legislation.

The industry body’s statement came after the release of a Senate Committee report on the proposed disclosure obligations for the Future Fund.

The Government’s report recommended the Future Fund be made exempt from disclosing asset prices, aimed at giving government funds the chance to operate on even footing with global markets.

The bill amended the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act to provide a partial exemption for documents handled by the Future Fund board and its agency in respect of the board’s investment activities.

It would reduce the risk of disclosing highly sensitive confidential and commercial material and align the treatment of the Future Fund board and the agency under the FOI Act with that of other entities that deal regularly with commercial information, such as NBN Co and Export Finance Australia.

But AIST said the amendment contrasted proposed disclosure regulations for super funds as the same exemption would not be provided for them.

According to AIST, it would instead require the funds to disclose exact values of directly held assets such as infrastructure and property, a move it said was not in the best financial interests of super fund members.

AIST chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said it was prejudicial to the effective operation of the Australian super system and nonsensical that the disclosure obligations for the Future Fund and Australian super funds were inconsistent.

“Just like the Future fund, Australian super funds must be able to compete on a level playing field with global institutional investors who generally aren’t required to disclose commercially sensitive information,” she said.

“Forcing super funds to disclose such information will put them at a significant disadvantage to their competitors and compromise their ability to deliver the best investment returns for members which they do by investing in job creating initiatives in Australia and supporting the ongoing health of the Australian economy.”

Scheerlinck said AIST supported disclosure, including that of unlisted assets and had proposed a framework for disclosing information that doesn’t compromise returns to members.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

While institutional investors, including super funds, unanimously acknowledge the energy transition as a significant challenge, their perspectives on the extent of their ...

17 hours ago

Despite a period of increased volatility, several considerations suggest that the bull market will remain intact and the trend in shares will remain up, an economist has ...

17 hours ago

HESTA has slammed Woodside’s climate transition action plan, pointing to “significant” gaps....

18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND