The appointment of a restructuring practitioner could trigger the disqualification of self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees, thanks to the introduction of a new category of disqualified person in the SIS Act.
Changes were made at the beginning of 2021 to include a new debt restructuring process and simplified liquidation process for eligible small businesses through a restructuring practitioner.
Following this, the SIS Act was also amended in December 2021 to include a new category of disqualified person which could affect SMSFs with corporate trustees.
In an update from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), it said: “This new category applies when a restructuring practitioner is appointed in an insolvency event. This will trigger the disqualification of a corporate trustee of a superannuation entity, including an SMSF, from managing a superannuation entity.
“If your SMSF has a corporate trustee, and a restructuring practitioner is appointed, the company will no longer be able to act as the corporate trustee, as it is disqualified.”
Existing funds needed to notify the ATO as soon as possible if this was the case.
If a restructuring practitioner was appointed, SMSFs needed to:
For new SMSFs, they would need to consider if the corporate trustee was eligible to act as one.
The $9 billion fund is backing agriculture investor GO.FARM, with its capital already directed towards enhancing two key assets.
Brighter Super is considerably scaling down the investment options it offers members in order to reduce costs.
Amid a challenging market environment, three super fund CIOs have warned against ‘jumping at shadows’.
The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees to act in the best financial interests of their members.
Add new comment