According to some asset managers, comparing international and domestic equities is not as simple as it might seem. This is because of the relatively recent distinction between ‘traditional’ international markets and ‘emerging’ international markets.
The term ‘traditional’ refers to the US and European markets, while ‘emerging’ encompasses Brazil, Russia, India and China, referred to as the BRIC countries.
Responding to the growing popularity in Australia for investment in BRIC countries, Standard & Poor’s and Dow Jones recently launched indices to capture these emerging markets.
Stuart James, associate director at Aberdeen, says that this is where the strong performances are to be found. “These only make up about 7 per cent of [traditional international funds], but emerging markets returned 42 per cent for the year up to May 31, 2006,” he says.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.