Retail superannuation funds should steer clear of appointing executive directors, according to Superannuation Consumers' Centre (SCC).
The SCC has used its submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) to argue that the inclusion of executive directors is not "consistent with the duty directors owe to members.
"Executives are more likely to be focused on the short term interests of the business rather than the longer-term interests of members," the submission said.
"We also think retail fund boards should include directors with proven expertise in member/consumer issues".
The SCC was established was established by consumer group Choice in 2012 and, elsewhere in its submission, states that it supports reform of super fund governance and support the broad approach in the ASX's Corporate Governance Principles, with the exception of the majority independent director approach.
It said with respect to the composition of superannuation fund boards it supported the one third, one third, one third approach for industry funds recommended by the Cooper Review.
"It is our assessment that the stakeholder model has delivered value for members to date and we are not aware of evidence to the contrary," the submission said.
"By contrast recent research reflecting on the impact of the 2003 ASX rules requiring listed companies to have a majority of independent directors suggests independent directors have tended to lack relevant industry experience and understanding and have driven dramatic pay increases," it said.
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.