Fund managers are going to be facing downward pressure on the fees they charge superannuation funds, with new research suggesting super fund members are failing to get good value from existing arrangements.
The research, undertaken by Rice Warner Actuaries and released at an Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) conference on the Gold Coast, has recommended superannuation funds use their bargaining muscle to move away from the existing asset-based regime, which generates fees regardless of performance.
The research was released by AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds, but not before a question and answer session at the conference saw the chief executive of Alliance Bernstein, Michael Bargholz, defend the existing arrangements as “suitable for consenting adults”.
Reynolds said the industry needed a fee model that “does more than reward fund managers for managing an ever-expanding pool of assets, even when they have not contributed to that growth”.
She said in circumstances where Australia boasted a compulsory system of superannuation, the existing funds management fee arrangements were a virtual “licence to print money”.
“The key issue is net returns to members,” Reynolds said. “Clearly it’s a better outcome for members if they can pay fund managers less but still get the same return for the same risk profile.
“If we are serious about reducing costs across the super sector, we can’t ignore investment fees,” she said. “Whilst we recognise that we still need to pay for talented and skilful fund managers, our key role is to act in the best interests of members. This in not about being cheap and nasty, it’s about paying fund managers for the value they deliver.”
The Rice Warner study, which primarily focused on listed Australian equities, recommended super funds move to a fixed dollar fee plus risk-adjusted performance fee model when negotiating fees with active managers of listed equities.
The study recommended a flat fixed dollar fee structure for management of index portfolios.
First Nations Australians have faced systemic barriers accessing super, with rigid ID checks, poor service, and delays compounding inequality.
“Slow and steady” appears to be the Reserve Bank’s approach to monetary policy as the board continues to hold on to its wait-and-see method.
AFCA’s latest data has shown a decline in complaints relating to superannuation, but there is further work to be done, it has warned super funds.
Limited exposure to fossil fuel companies has positively impacted the performance of Australian Ethical’s balanced and growth funds, the super fund says.