West Australian public sector fund GESB has adopted the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia's (ASFA's) Standard Risk Measure (SRM) to allow funds to better compare the merits and pitfalls of its ready-made investment strategies.
ASFA developed the SRM in conjunction with the Financial Services Council (FSC) to quantify investment options' risk levels as related to the potential for negative annual returns over a 20-year period.
GESB warned its members that the standards were not fail-safe as the SRM did not give an indication of the size of potential negative returns or align the likelihood for positive returns with member's objectives. It said members should still ensure they were comfortable with the risks and potential losses associated with investment decisions.
The $16 billion fund said it estimated the risk of each investment option from assumptions about investment market performance, the likelihood of fluctuations in returns and the relationship between asset classes.
The ASFA/FSC SRM has received criticism from industry players such as the Super Ratings for its failure to address longevity risk.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.