Senator Jane Hume has the opportunity to show “real leadership” by committing to boost the superannuation savings of women as women tended to retire with almost $60,000 less super than men, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).
ISA called on Hume, the Minister for Superannuation Financial Services and the Digital Economy, and the Minister for Women’s Economic Security, and the Government to re-commit to sticking with the legislated super guarantee (SG) increase as it had been “dragging its feet”.
It also pointed to the fact the Government was considering leaving the SG at 9.5% even though Government members of parliament earned 15.4% super.
ISA advocacy director, Georgia Brumby said: “It is time we bridged the gender super gap, it’s not right that women retire with balances persistently lower than what they need for an adequate retirement.
“Politicians have a choice they can fight for a super increase and to get super paid on every dollar earnt or turn their back as more women risk retiring into poverty.
“Jane Hume, as both the super minister and the minister for women’s economic security, has an opportunity to show real leadership and re-commit to boosting the super savings of women everywhere.”
ISA said the median super balance for a woman in her early 60s was $146,900 compared to men with $204,200, and both genders had less than the $545,000 recommended for a comfortable retirement.
ISA noted the Government was dragging its feet on reforms that would improve women’s economic security including:
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.