The idea of compulsory superannuation has “not been entirely successful” in meeting its intended goals, according to Future Fund chair Peter Costello.
Speaking at the UBS conference in Sydney, Future Fund chair and former treasurer Peter Costello discussed the $3 trillion that had accumulated since the introduction of superannuation in 1992 by the Hawke government.
At the time, it was stated that super would promote self-funded retirement savings and reduce reliance on a publicly funded pension system. A ‘three-pillar approach’ to retirement included compulsory employer contributions, voluntary member contributions to super funds and a means-test government-funded age pension.
However, Costello felt that despite the contributions made by members, super is not yet enough to mean people require no help from the state.
“The purpose of compulsory superannuation was to get this generation, the Boomer generation, to fund their own retirement and not draw down on public finances. What we are finding is the accumulation you make might be enough to take you off a part-pension but not fully, so compulsory superannuation has not been entirely successful,” Costello said.
“It will save some money but it won’t save a lot so it’s making a contribution, but not the contribution we had hoped.”
Costello has been at the head at sovereign wealth fund Future Fund since its creation in 2006, but will step down in February 2024, one of three guardians to depart in the next few months.
Referencing suggestions that the Future Fund should be liquidated, Costello said the problem is it will be unlikely to be rebuilt if that happened.
“Once it is spent, it is gone, it will never be replaced and our financial situation will be even more precarious. I would like to see this asset around for a very long time to come.”
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.