Hostplus has adjusted its strategic asset allocation (SAA), making a move away from sovereign bonds and cash and towards infrastructure and direct property.
Following a board meeting last Thursday, the decision was made to increase the fund's allocation to infrastructure from 8 per cent to 10 per cent, according to Hostplus chief investment officer Sam Sicilia. In addition, the allocation to direct property was increased from 13 per cent to 15 per cent, he said.
The changes would come at the expense of sovereign bonds and cash, Sicilia said.
"We think that unlisted, income-producing assets [such as infrastructure and direct property] have defensive characteristics. We don't like bonds," Sicilia said.
The yields on bonds were low, and there were better opportunities elsewhere, he added.
"Hostplus has a relatively young member base (one million members with an average age of 26) so we don't actually need the defensive characteristics of bonds - we get them in infrastructure and direct property," Sicilia said.
Because Hostplus is a $10 billion fund, a 4 per cent change to its SAA could potentially mean a $400 million change in its investments. However, Sicilia was quick to add that the changes to the fund's SAA would not equate to money flowing immediately.
"It doesn't mean we're going to invest that amount - it just gives us the ability to do so," he said.
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.