POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
How can funds mitigate the risk of illiquid assets?
A possible way to mitigate the risk of investing in illiquid markets could be by limiting the ability of members to switch between investment options, according to State Street.
Speaking to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), David Grose, head of alternatives-Australia at State Street, said there were benefits to investing in private markets, but they came with liquidity risks.
Therefore, he said, it was important to consider structural and governance changes that might arise for a fund and how they would affect those assets.
“Ultimately, as long as there’s a mismatch between the liquidity of the underlying investments and the liquidity offered to members, some of these risks will inevitably continue to exist,” Grose said.
Two options suggested could be limiting members’ ability to switch between different investment options or implementing a delay, which would reduce problems with investors trading on outdated prices.
“Regulators could encourage super funds to limit the ability of members to freely transfer between different investment options. I’d question whether the majority of members have a real need to switch between investment options more than once or twice a year, which is permitted at the moment.
“If a limit was placed on this and on transferring between different funds, it would reduce the problems caused by investors trading on old prices for private market assets.”
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) introduced SPS 530 Investment Governance in Superannuation last year, and it was hoped this would resolve some challenges posed by illiquid assets and improve funds’ governance.
The paper covered issues such as stress testing, valuations and liquidity management.
Stress testing was likely to be more difficult, Grose said, if a fund held private market investments as they were less transparent than those in a public market.
“SPS 530 really requires them to demonstrate that they’ve satisfied themselves in relation to appropriate valuations and considered any conflicts of interest that the manager may have faced,” he said.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
