Industry needs to help form suitable MySuper model

16 November 2010
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Geoff Peck

The superannuation industry needs to communicate with the Government on how MySuper will be implemented, otherwise it risks ending up with a model that is not ideal for either trustees or members.

With the introduction of MySuper, which is perceived as being the option for members who are completely disengaged, trustees may end up effectively dividing their memberships into those who are and those are not engaged with their super. It could also result in less engaged members effectively delegating responsibility for their super to trustees.

That raised questions regarding the Cooper Review’s recommendation for trustees to manage MySuper members’ investment risk “safely”, according to Geoff Peck, managing director of government and institutions at Russell Investments.

Peck said a current default fund would often be allocated around 70/30 to growth assets, which may not be suitable for a retiree, who has a greater need of capital preservation and regular income.

Currently trustees are able to mail information to members, who have the responsibility of changing their investment options when required, but the new arrangements could see more responsibility placed on trustees and could potentially lead to the use of products such as lifecycle investment strategies in MySuper funds, Peck said.

“Most super funds run as a series of investment options measured against benchmarks, they are not specifically set up where performance is measured against individual retirement outcomes,” he said.

Peck also questioned what other relevant personal factors aside from age could be known to trustees and could be used to make investment decisions on behalf of members. He then asked whether trustees would be obligated to take these factors into account as well.

While it was still too early to tell what form MySuper would take if it was implemented, Peck said he was trying to highlight some of the issues that could become a concern without sensible regulations and framework.

“The industry needs to engage with the Government around the next phase if the Government decides to support the Cooper regulations,” Peck said.

“We need to understand their intent and be prepared to engage with them if they support the recommendations. You need to consider the potential pitfalls when you create changes on this scale.”

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 7 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 7 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 7 months ago

The US and Europe trade deal represents a significant step forward in resolving trade conflict, but markets have largely priced in the good news already, says the asset m...

21 hours ago

Morningstar expects the Reserve Bank will still make around three cuts in this cycle, bringing the cash rate to a neutral level of around 3 per cent....

21 hours ago

Economists have tipped inflation to ease further, but any upside surprise in the June quarter CPI could derail the Reserve Bank’s plans....

21 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
85.26 3 y p.a(%)
5