An onslaught of information could well mean superannuation fund members are going to ignore what is on a super fund website, a chief behavioural economist said.
University of California professor Shlomo Benartzi told the 2014 ASFA Conference in Melbourne that super funds should think of themselves as digital fiduciaries in the digital technology era.
But he stressed that if members visit super fund websites, funds have to assume that they are not going to pay much attention.
"They're also not going to think about things as seriously as you think they should. The wealth of information creates scarcity of whatever information consumed," Benartzi said.
Super fund website effectiveness hinges on whether members trust that website, followed by its visual attractiveness and user friendliness.
Benartzi wondered if super funds should build an application that allows members to take actions on an iPhone when the market fluctuates, like making portfolio structure changes and buying annuities.
But Benartzi argued none of this will bare fruit unless super fund websites personalise their features and reports to suit their particular members, and then test the site to make sure it meets members' needs.
"Members judge websites in 50 milliseconds so when people come to your site, you're not given a second chance. You're not even given a first chance."
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.