Fees levied to pay for financial advice represent only a small proportion of the approximately $8.5 billion in fees levied by Australia’s major superannuation funds.
That is the bottom line of evidence delivered to the Senate Economics Legislation Commission review of the Your Future, Your Super legislation with Super Consumers Australia (SCA) confirming that the largest proportion of fees levied by superannuation funds went towards administration and investment.
Answering questions on notice, SCA confirmed earlier analysis of where financial planning stands in terms of superannuation fund cost structures.
What is more, the SCA answer suggested that Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) data probably failed to fully reveal the level of investment fees.
“For the financial year ending June 2020, approximately $3.6 billion in administration fees were paid to large APRA regulated funds. By comparison $2.9 billion was paid in investment fees and total fees paid equalled $8.5 billion,” the SCA told the committee.
“The remaining fees paid consisted of insurance fees, advice fees and activity fees. However, we note that this APRA data significantly under-reports investment fees as highlighted by the Productivity Commission,” it said.
“The median disclosed administration fee for a MySuper product member with a representative balance of $50,000 in December 2020 is 0.325%. The median investment fee was found to be 0.725%.”
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
In a 3 trillion dollars mature superannuation and retirement income industry there is really no place for retail investment management fees.
The kick back between the wholesale and retail investment management fee to the fund (consildator) is not at all warranted.
The consolidator could in instances pass some of this rebate to a member or combined family member s based on the overall total value of the members holding.
If wholesale investment management fees were applied to member accounts then “only” will the overall fee charged to the member be reduced.