Lifting SG outweighs Henry options

5 May 2011
| By Mike |

Voluntary savings beyond the superannuation guarantee will not deliver Australians a comfortable retirement in the way that lifting the superannuation guarantee would, says the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In a report issued this week, ASFA appears to have abandoned the notion of ‘soft compulsion’, concluding that compulsorily lifting the SG to 12 per cent is necessary because “the available evidence suggests” voluntary contributions will not achieve the desired outcomes.

ASFA policy had previously argued for “soft compulsion” as a means of dealing with Australia’s retirement incomes shortfall.

A spokesperson for ASFA later indicated that the organisation had not totally abandoned support for soft compulsion, believing it still had a part in the policy mix alongside a higher superannuation guarantee.

“Despite significant tax incentives for marking voluntary superannuation contributions, only around 20 per cent of employees do this,” the report said. “As well, the incidence of making salary sacrifice contributions only really begins to pick up after age 45.”

“Compulsory superannuation contributions are both needed and wanted. Leaving decisions about the level and timing of contributions to individuals would mean the great bulk of Australians would not make additional contributions,” it said.

The ASFA report suggested that for the minority of Australians that did make additional contributions, these would generally be made later in life when the impact on final retirement savings would be less.

In pointing to the report findings, ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos, said it confirmed that Australians would be better served by a lift in the compulsory SG than under the recommendations of the Henry Tax Review.

Indeed, the ASFA report analysis of the Henry Review pointed out that its recommendations were based on interactions with a proposed personal income tax system that was substantially different to the current one and which the Government had ruled out adopting.

As well, it said the Henry recommendations with respect to superannuation would result in substantial ongoing costs to tax revenue, individuals having to pay tax out of what was previously take-home pay, and administration complexity.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 7 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 7 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 7 months ago

The industry fund has appointed Natalie Alfrod as its new chief risk officer, strengthening its executive team during a period of transformation....

14 minutes 7 seconds ago

New data suggests private market performance far exceeded public equities in Q1 2025....

23 hours ago

The Super Members Council has outlined a bold reform plan to boost productivity, lift retirement savings, and unlock super’s full potential....

23 hours 36 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
3