(May-2004) And then there were none

18 July 2005
| By Mike |

The Top Super Funds survey published in this edition of Super Review should bring home to readers just how quickly the super landscape is changing and the manner in which this change is being driven by the combined influences of the Financial Services Reform Act and the licensing of trustees.

What our research shows and what is confirmed by the contributions made by Towers Perrin, Mercer and MLC is that a serious consolidation has occurred within the corporate super sector, with many fund trustees deciding that competitive pressures plus a more exacting regulatory environment means it makes good sense to outsource.

The research also shows there is no common formula when it comes to outsourcing. Some funds have opted to simply outsource one or two functions, while others have outsourced entirely and, as a consequence, have virtually disappeared off our radar screens.

The winners in the process have undoubtedly been the master trusts and one or two of the major industry funds. It is probably too early to determine whether the fund members affected by the outsourcing are also winners, though the odds are that the vast majority are going to be no worse off.

What is hidden in the raw data, however, is the reality that what has happened over the past 12 to 18 months has been nothing short of a fundamental change in the way Australia’s companies do business and relate to their employees.

Gone are the days when employees of the Acme Widget Company could expect their super contributions to flow into the Acme Widget Fund — a fund run by trustees who were company employees.

Today, the Acme Widget Fund, if it still exists at all, is most likely just a façade for a master trust.

Ultimately, of course, outsourcing is very often the most sensible option. None of the employees of the Acme Widget Company will thank their employers or fund trustees ifthe fund underperforms or offers inadequate service. Nor are the regulators in the business of offering dispensations to trustees or funds which fail to meet their regulatory obligations.

In other words, outsourcing is a sensible response for trustees confronting a more challenging regulatory and competitive environment. The question over the next 12 months will be the degree to which the trend continues and how it will impact the Super Review Top Super Funds survey over the next 12 to 18 months.

Mike Taylor

Editor

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 8 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 8 months ago

With the latest print of GDP figures overshooting economist expectations, analysts have warned that the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) could face a difficult policy path...

3 days 15 hours ago

The peak body has called on the corporate watchdog to add superannuation to its recently announced simplification process that aims to cull red tape in financial services...

3 days 15 hours ago

APRA has highlighted cyber security, AI oversight, geopolitical risks, and system stress testing as key concerns for superannuation and banks....

3 days 15 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND