Members' interests trump Asset/CareSuper merger

7 June 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The best interest of members is still driving Asset Super (Asset) decision-making and not a need to align with CareSuper (Care) in the lead-up to their merger said Asset chief executive John Paul.

The merger date has been set for 26 October 2012, but Paul said while the super fund wasn’t entering into any long-term contracts, any necessary decision-making would be driven by a concern for the individual fund and its members.

“But we won’t merge until we meet the successor fund deed requirement which is that we have to have a legal sign-off to say that members of Asset in the main are either equal in the benefit that they will get going into the merger or that they will have better benefits,” he said.

However, Paul said he was supportive of the merger which will bring benefits of economies of scale, internal resourcing, and more choice for members. Both funds are currently working on unifying fund services and transitioning.

Earlier in the year, CommInsure won an internal tender process to appoint a single insurance provider edging out Asset’s current insurer, MLC. Paul said the new insurance arrangement could deliver more flexibility and comprehensive cover options for Asset members.

Both funds employ National Asset Servicing for custodian services and Australian Administration Services (AAS) for administration, although Paul said they still had to transfer members into the same bucket on the AAS platform as Care’s administration is administered from Melbourne and from Sydney for Asset.

Paul said Asset also had to notify their advice provider – Money Solutions – of their intention to switch to Care’s provider, IFFP, after the trustees have signed off on the merger.

He said they wouldn’t have everything done by 26 October, particularly Asset’s tax returns which will be finalised later in the year, but they are working now to “cross the T’s and dot the I’s”.

Nevertheless, he said if asset consultant Mercer advised them of an underperforming fund manager, they would not automatically choose a Care-aligned manager as a replacement.

“Obviously with a merger you try as best you can to harmonise things. That’s not always possible, and certainly we’re running the fund as we should be – as a stand-alone asset fund at the present time, but we’re keeping an eye on things,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 5 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Private market assets in super have surged, while private debt recorded the fastest growth among all investment types....

6 hours 50 minutes ago

The equities investor has launched a new long-short fund seeded by UniSuper, targeting alpha from ASX 300 equities using AI insights....

6 hours 54 minutes ago

The fund has strengthened efforts to boost gender diversity, targeting 40:40:20 balance across its investment teams by 2030....

6 hours 57 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3