Members like services - until they have to pay

12 November 2010
| By Mike |

Superannuation fund members are more concerned with paying a lower rate of fees than receiving a wider range of services such as advice and access to information, according to the results of a Mercer survey presented at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) conference in Adelaide by Mercer principal Elyssia Silberstein.

Investment performance and competitive fees were ranked as the two most important factors for a super fund, according to the survey of 509 fund members representing a wide range of ages and account balances.

Other services, such as access to face-to-face advice, web-based information and other web-based tools, were also important, but the majority of members surveyed believed they should only have to pay for services that were used infrequently, such as face-to-face advice.

Older members surveyed were more likely to favour greater access to fees in exchange for more services. Older members were also more likely to report a higher awareness of the fees they paid and were also more likely to believe the fees they paid were reasonable.

Half of those surveyed preferred to pay a flat monthly fee while a quarter favoured a fee based on their level of interaction with the fund.

Australian Administration Services (AAS) chief executive John McMurtrie said there was a disconnect between trustees and members, and he also questioned the value of intra-fund advice.

Only a small percentage of calls to AAS related to intra-fund advice, which he said was not very useful as a form of engagement.

“If you can’t talk to a member in the accumulation phase about a retirement product you’re missing an opportunity to guide that member through your own products,” he said.

In terms of a member’s willingness to pay for services, McMurtrie said while they valued services such as advice, [members] were rarely prepared to pay for it. It is a similar story with investment choice and insurance, he said.

Generally, if a fund did not provide Statements of Advice (SoAs) for free then the take up of SoAs fell to virtually nothing, McMurtrie said.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call....

3 hours 58 minutes ago

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several years ago, when the fund...

4 hours ago

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their platforms, according to its deputy chair....

4 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5