More Australians are retiring with a second property and a decreased share in the family home, according to research from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI), suggesting that retiring households were not re-structuring their financial assets or boosting levels of owner-occupied housing to make sure they were eligible for the age pension.
The research analysed data collected between 2002 and 2014, and found the number of households retiring with a second property grew from around one quarter to 30 per cent.
AHURI also found that the share of owner-occupied housing in a retired household’s asset portfolio had fallen from 46 per cent in 2002 to 39 per cent in 2014.
The report proposed that the age pension could be structured over time to become “tenure neutral”, by adjusting the respective thresholds for individuals or households that do and do not own property.
Associate professor from the University of Sydney, Stephen Whelan, said retirement income policy and the place of housing in that framework is complex, and any tax reforms should be fair, sustainable and promote efficiency.
“It is critical that changes to retirement income policy provide sufficient time and guidance for individuals to make appropriate decisions in the life-cycle context,” said Whelan.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.