MySuper fees problematic

16 April 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The theory around standardised fees within MySuper is very simple but, in practice, it has led to distortions, according to an analysis published by actuarial consultancy, Rice Warner.

The analysis, published by Rice Warner consultant, Nathan Bonarius, argues that these distortions have occurred because the disclosed investment fees do not have any reference to the underlying asset allocation of the MySuper option.

As well, the analysis claimed that many funds had lifecycle products which reduced growth assets over the decades approaching retirement and that, apart from reducing retirement outcomes for members, some of these funds also maintained fees at higher levels than was justified by the change in asset allocation.

"Products providing an interest rate (bank savings accounts and term deposits) are shown as having no explicit fee.  Technically, this is correct as the fee is taken out of interest margins.  However, it does show cash to be the cheapest product even though it is generally the most inappropriate class for long-term investment," Bonarius' analysis said.

It said the disclosure of indirect costs varied widely between funds and that the managed funds they invested in were not required to disclose indirect costs which made obtaining information difficult, especially from overseas providers.

"Layering of costs can result in poor disclosure where the superannuation fund does not have a direct relationship with the final asset manager," the analysis said.

It said a recent Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) class order on indirect cost ratios was making progress on improving fee disclosure by removing much of the ambiguity surrounding the old definition as well as providing some good principle- based rules for disclosure. However the analysis concluded that here was still capacity for broad improvements in fee disclosure across the industry and that this required "a focus on principles rather than a set of prescriptive rules which distort the way funds disclose their fees in order to gain a competitive advantage".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

3 days 8 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

4 days ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

3 days 15 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND