While current investment approaches in superannuation serve those accumulating super well, there is opportunity for funds to create more bespoke investment approaches for those who are in the retirement phase, AMP Capital believes.
The firm’s senior portfolio manager, multi-asset group, Darren Beesley, said that differences in retirees’ super objectives meant that one-size-fits-all investment practices used in the accumulation phase don’t always suit those in drawdown.
He pointed to defining risk by the growth/defensive split, underutilising tax trade-offs, holding a static asset allocation, having less focus on inflation risk and thinking ‘defensive’ assets are actually defensive as some such investment practices.
“It’s no longer just about total returns within a growth/defensive bucket,” Beesley said.
He believed that superannuation funds needed to ensure that retirees’ portfolios had the following attributes designed to address risks and needs in retirement:
“As the amount of assets entering retirement continues to grow, we believe the industry will invest differently for those in retirement. Risk needs to be defined differently, tax needs to be accounted for, and the stability of return needs greater focus,” Beesley said.
He warned that investors should be asking whether their post-retirement funds were making such adjustments.
The two funds have announced the signing of a non-binding MOU to explore a potential merger.
The board must shift its focus from managing inflation to stimulating the economy with the trimmed mean inflation figure edging closer to the 2.5 per cent target, economists have said.
ASIC chair Joe Longo says superannuation trustees must do more to protect members from misconduct and high-risk schemes.
Super fund mergers are rising, but poor planning during successor fund transfers has left members and employers exposed to serious risks.