POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
No performance loss seen in ESG funds
Superannuation fund members who opt for an environmental, social and governance fund experience no performance loss compared to a non-ESG approach, according to Rainmaker.
In its research, the firm identified 43 super funds that identified as ESG super funds and managed $1.8 trillion, up 13% since 2021.
The organisation said the 10 biggest funds accounted for $1.2 trillion of the total $1.8 trillion and this concentration was “growing rapidly”. Seven of the 10 were not-for-profit funds and three were retail funds.
Rainmaker found the returns delivered by ESG super funds were as robust as those offered by regular super funds.
Analysis of MySuper returns compared to the broad market found three and five year periods up to December 2021 showed “no discernible difference” between the median returns in the ESG sample compared to the broad market. Both delivered 10.6% over three years and 8.5% over five years per annum.
Comparison of Rainmaker’s Diversifed ESG indexes of rolling 12-month returns from 2015-2021 showed “no difference in investment outcomes” for ESG investment options. The ESG Diversified index delivered 8.6% compared to 8.8% by the broad market over five years per annum.
“It is unreasonable to argue that ESG super funds outperform simply because they follow ESG investment principles. But the key strategic point is there is no evidence that investors into ESG super funds suffer any performance penalty at all. Indeed there is evidence to the contrary, namely that ESG super funds are indeed highly likely to outperform.”
Source: Rainmaker
There had also been a difference in the types of screening used by super funds for ESG purposes; the number using positive screens had increased dramatically from 52% to 80% while negative screens had increased from 87% to 95%.
The proportion which were using no screening at all had halved from 10% to 5%.
“Crucially, the way ESG funds have done this is by applying the PRI SDG framework, a practice now explicitly followed by half the ESG super funds in Rainmaker’s 2022 sample. It’s quite likely many other ESG super funds do so too but haven’t yet explicitly articulated this position.
“This principles-based SDG approach is highly practical because it enables super fund trustee boards to implement nuanced fiduciary-led and engagement-driven ESG investment decision making practices, rather than simplistically following tick-box divestment strategies.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
Super funds have built on early financial year momentum, as growth funds deliver strong results driven by equities and resilient bonds.
The super fund has announced that Mark Rider will step down from his position of chief investment officer (CIO) after deciding to “semi-retire” from full-time work.
Rest has joined forces with alternative asset manager Blue Owl Capital, co-investing in a real estate trust, with the aim of capitalising on systemic changes in debt financing.
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
