Employers who find their default superannuation fund arrangements altered as a result of the Fair Work Commission’s (FWC’s) current review, may have difficulty dealing with their situation because the Government has made no specific funding provisions for communicating the outcomes.
The Department of Employment has confirmed that no specific plan is in place to communicate with affected employers, but states that it is monitoring the situation.
The regime was put in place by former Employment and Workplace Relations Minister and now Opposition leader, Bill Shorten.
In answers to questions on notice by National Party Senator, Bridget McKenzie, the department said it was “closely monitoring proceedings during the four-yearly review of default fund terms in modern awards”.
“If the department becomes aware of any potential significant disruption for employers arising from the review, the department will provide advice to the Minister accordingly,” it said.
Senator McKenzie had asked whether the department had devised a communications strategy to deal with employers and whether amnesties would be granted.
The departmental answer did not deal with the possibility of an amnesty.
In other answers provided during Senate Estimates, the department could not provide its own estimate of the cost of the default funds review exercise, but referenced a figure provided by the Financial Services Council of $45 million.
The department also admitted it could not provide an definitive answer with respect to how many employer default funds were being grandfathered through the process.
“On the matter of grandfathered employer plans, employers using their own plans prior to commencement of modern awards were not required to notify they were continuing to use these plans. Consequently, there is no record of how many employer plans have been grandfathered,” the departmental answer said.
Amid a challenging market environment, three super fund CIOs have warned against ‘jumping at shadows’.
The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees to act in the best financial interests of their members.
AustralianSuper, Rest, and HESTA agree on the need to retain and enhance the test, yet they differ in their perspectives on the specific areas that warrant further refinement.
Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region.
Add new comment