Superannuation funds and their executives who are found to have failed in their duties under the Government’s proposed new Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) will not be able to rely on members’ funds to bail them out.
That will be one of the key bottom lines of the Government’ proposed new Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) with exposure draft reveal that superannuation fund licensees will be prohibited form using trust assets to pay a civil penalty arising from breaching an obligation under the FAR.
What is more, it is unclear the degree to which superannuation funds or other financial services businesses will be able to insure against such eventualities.
The maximum penalties under the FAR are significant with the Financial Services Council (FSC) noting that the penalties are to be the greater of:
Responding to a discussion paper on the new FAR, the FSC said that, “interestingly, in the case of RSE [superannuation] licensees, it is noted that RSE licensees will be prohibited from using trust assets to pay a civil penalty arising from breaching an obligation under the FAR”.
It said that provision would be made for the court to have regard to the impact of the penalty on the trustee’s superannuation fund membership.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.