No statute of limitations on super mistakes

12 January 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

There is no statute of limitations applying to superannuation funds and their administrators fixing errors, according to a recent determination of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT).

The determination saw a superannuation fund and its insurer required to restore total and permanent disablement (TPD) cover to a member who had been wrongly designated as working part-time decades earlier.

In overturning the decisions of the superannuation fund and its insurer, the SCT said it accepted on the evidence before it that the complainant had been denied cover for TPD as a result of administrative errors on the part of the trustee.

"Had these errors not occurred she would have had TPD cover from the time of her first joining the fund," it said.

The SCT determination declared that the "primary obligation on the part of the trustee, once it has been appraised of errors is to correct them".

"There is no statute of limitation applicable to this obligation. In the opinion of the tribunal it is neither fair nor reasonable for the trustee to deny the complainant access to cover because of its errors," the determination said.

It said that the trustee had advised that the premiums payable for TPD insurance from 10 February 1992 to 11 February 2010 totalled $860.35 and ordered the superannuation fund to offer the complainant the opportunity to lodge a TPD claim with the fund on the condition that the complainant pay any outstanding premiums for the TPD benefit. How this is achieved is in the hands of the trustee.

"The complainant would have to lodge a claim, should she so wish, and be assessed under the terms of the policy. The tribunal notes that there is no guarantee that her claim would succeed. The insurer is on risk and would have to assess any claim that is made in the ordinary manner," the determination said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Steve Blizard on Thu, 01/12/2017 - 17:58

But if the super fund was transferred to the ATO, under the spurious "inactive account" system, & the insurance cover lapsed, rendering the member potentially uninsurable in the future, the Fed Govt takes no legal responsibility.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The sovereign wealth fund grew $11.5 billion in the March quarter, according to its latest portfolio update, having previously voiced caution about inflation’s downward t...

4 hours ago

The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees ...

7 hours ago

Christophe Picardel, Regional Head of Private Capital for Asia Pacific, Securities Services at BNP Paribas’Philippe Kerdoncuff, Head of Asset Owners and Asset Managers, A...

9 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND