(November-2003) This is not a chicken or egg debate

29 September 2005
| By Zilla Efrat |

Finally, the Government has been able to get its long-awaited cut to the surcharge for high-income earners and its co-contributions scheme for lower-paid workers through the Senate (after securing the support of the four independent senators).

Will it be able to do the same for choice-of-funds and portablilty? And what will the Labor Party’s choice-of-fund model look like when it is unveiled at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) conference in Brisbane later this month?

Super Reviews survey of super funds providing SRI options (see p21) highlights just how little members make use of the choices offered to them. Almost half (46 per cent) of respondents described the uptake of their SRI options as poor. Only one fund said demand was “exceptional”, but noted that the SRI option was its default option.

Could this low uptake be the result of abounding perceptions that SRI means sacrificing returns? Or, could it be part of the wider trend that sees most members languishing in default options? It’s hard enough to choose one option within a fund, never mind between the dozens of retail and not-for-profit funds out there.

The world of super is extremely complex and whether choice-of-fund is legislated or not, many Australians already make their own choices. If they aren’t properly informed, they could make bad choices that eat into their retirement savings. Or, if they seek help, they could pay often unnecessary commissions and trails to financial planners that also eat up their nest eggs.

Of the $28.7 million set aside for choice by the Government in the 2002-03 Budget, $14 million is earmarked for a public education campaign. ASFA, however, believes this will not be enough. In its pre-Budget (2004-05) submission, ASFA calls on the Government to allocate $70 million more over three years for an education campaign.

We hear so much about choice-of-fund these days and not much about improving the public’s financial literacy and understanding about super, which, surely, is an essential forerunner to choice being introduced. This, surely, is not a “chicken or the egg” debate.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 8 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 8 months ago

The super fund is open to the idea of using crypto ETFs to invest in the asset class, but says there are important compliance checks to tick off first....

15 hours ago

ASIC has launched civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against one of the super trustees wrapped up in the Shield Master Fund failure....

16 hours ago

Industry associations have welcomed the Treasurer’s review into the superannuation performance test and called for targeted changes that would enable investment in certai...

16 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3