Object lessons in CitiStreet failure

14 January 2010
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Australia's three largest superannuation administrators have pointed to the now-defunct joint venture between State Street and CitigroupCitiStreet — as an example of what can go wrong when margins are too narrow.

In a joint submission to the Cooper Review into superannuation, the three administrators used the demise of CitiStreet to underline their arguments with respect to pricing and claimed that, with respect to long-term viability, there were lessons to be learnt specifically from the CitiStreet case study.

The submission described CitiStreet Pty Ltd as a joint venture between State Street and Citigroup operating in the Australian market from 2002 to 2008 aiming to "bring a powerful force in solutions for superannuation and member services".

It said CitiStreet entered the market with SunSuper as a cornerstone client and expanded to a number of other clients including Non-Government Schools and EquipSuper, but added that while the administrator had the financial backing of two multinationals, systems, experience and a solid client base, it could not make a profit.

The submission said according to the last financial accounts lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission for the calendar year ending 2007, CitiStreet had posted a net operating loss of $10.5 million.

"In 2008, partially due to the shake up in investment banking resulting from the global financial crisis, the international backers made the decision to exit the Australian market, leaving CitiStreet clients to find alternative arrangements.

"CitiStreet was in effect absorbed by its major client SunSuper, with other clients moving to alternative administrators. Ultimately, no superannuation fund member administered by CitiStreet lost their savings in this experience, however, the risks and costs associated with the prompt exit will ultimately be borne by members and impact their long-term retirement benefit," the submission said.

"The lesson here is that margins have been too low to provide a framework for sustainable long-term investment," it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Large superannuation accounts may need to find funds outside their accounts or take the extreme step of selling non-liquid assets under the proposed $3 million super tax ...

4 hours ago

Economists have been left scrambling to recalibrate after the Reserve Bank wrong-footed markets on Tuesday, holding the cash rate steady despite widespread expectations o...

4 hours ago

Institutional investors have increased their risk exposure over June amid tempered levels of market volatility....

5 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5