The Institute for Public Accountants has slammed penalties for super guarantee (SG) non-compliance as “draconian,” saying that they could be very damaging to struggling small businesses and warning that more red tape could be coming.
Presently, non-complying employers would be required to pay “onerous charges” of both the total of their total SG shortfalls for the year and nominal interest and administration fees for that quarter.
They could also be liable to pay an additional SG penalty of up to 200 per cent of the SG charge payable should they fail to lodge an SG statement to the Commissioner.
The IPA labelled such punishments “draconian,” saying that it could damage small businesses struggling with cash flow issues.
While IPA chief executive officer, Andrew Conway, acknowledged that employers should make timely and accurate superannuation payments on behalf of their staff, he slammed the penalties for failing to differentiate between small businesses.
“Let’s get human and … not tar every small business with the same excessive compliance brush,” he said.
Conway said “a more measured approach” to non-compliance was needed, with the “draconian” measures needing to go before new measures, such as education, imprisonment or directions to pay, were added.
Amid a challenging market environment, three super fund CIOs have warned against ‘jumping at shadows’.
The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees to act in the best financial interests of their members.
AustralianSuper, Rest, and HESTA agree on the need to retain and enhance the test, yet they differ in their perspectives on the specific areas that warrant further refinement.
Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region.
Add new comment