PC report canvasses lifting preservation age

7 July 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Opposition has called on the Government to confirm its commitment to no changes to super in wake of the Productivity Commission's (PC) release of a Superannuation Policy and Post-Retirement report canvassing lifting the super preservation age.

The shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen, made the call amid industry debate generated by the PC report.

However, while the report canvassed achieving up to $7 billion in savings from lifting the preservation age and urged the Government to more finely target superannuation policy, it also pointed to the fact that transition to retirement pension arrangements have become almost the sole preserve of the wealthy.

The PC report said that transition to retirement pensions, though intended to encourage a gradual shift from full-time work to full-time retirement, could be used to reduce a worker's tax liability.  

What is more, the report said such arrangements appeared to mostly preserve the wealthy.  

Discussing those likely to be utilising transition to retirement arrangements, the report said they were "more likely to be working full-time and earned higher incomes than those not using transition to retirement pension arrangements".  

"In terms of the households discussed earlier and used in the Commission's modelling, those using transition to retirement pensions were almost exclusively in the two wealthiest quartiles of couple households," it said.

"While the data are imperfect, the available evidence does tend to suggest that transition to retirement pensions are used almost exclusively by the wealthy."  

The PC report event obliquely points to the likelihood that those accessing transition to retirement arrangements are doing so on the basis of financial advice, stating: "Why this should be the case is unclear. From the age of 55 years onwards, the tax incentives are strong enough that most who are employed and facing a marginal tax rate of greater than 15 per cent should avail themselves of the transition to retirement pension".  

"It may be a case that those with lower incomes have less of an incentive to do so relative to those facing higher income tax liabilities, or it may also be the case that many are unaware of the transition to retirement pension arrangements that currently exist."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

5 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

1 day 5 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

1 day 5 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND