Return targets could be manipulated by using different probabilities under Product Dashboard requirements, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has said in a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
AIST said that the probability of achieving a targeted return should be included in target return requirements but that this probability should be high — 75 per cent — based on the potential for large margins of error.
Cbus estimated the difference between a 50 per cent probability target and 75 per cent target to be 2 per cent per annum. This means an investment objective of CPI+3.35 per cent per annum on a rolling 10-year basis would change to CPI-5.5 per cent with a 50 per cent probability, according to AIST.
"The basis for a return target is much less credible if it can be manipulated by changing the assumed probability of achieving the target," it said.
Consumers would reasonably think that their super fund had a high probability of achieving the targeted return — and they needed a high figure to be mandated to imbue confidence in the system.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.