Industry Super Australia (ISA) has claimed that retail superannuation providers have been able to disguise their true cost via the use of investment platforms.
In a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) responding to a discussion paper on superannuation reporting standards, the ISA pointed to platforms as being problematic.
It stated, "a fundamental problem with the fee and cost disclosure regime for indirectly held assets is that entities invested in via a platform at an investor's direction are automatically excluded from the definition of ‘interposed vehicle'."
"The retail superannuation sector typically provides its choice superannuation products through platforms. As a result of this exclusion, the fees and costs for retail superannuation products will appear less expensive than investments offered by funds that are not held via a platform," the ISA submission said.
It claimed this would affect the accuracy of product disclosure statements (PDSs), periodic statements, and analysis by independent commentators which was based in part on fee information produced by superannuation funds.
"This is at odds with the policy objectives of improving the accuracy of disclosure of fees and costs, enabling consumers to compare true fees and costs across products and drive down fees," the submission said.
It said the ISA "has significant concerns about the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC's) proposed approach which undermine transparent, consistent, and comparable fee disclosure" .
"ISA has made submissions to ASIC about these concerns and we are continuing to engage with ASIC about these issues and work towards satisfactory solutions. However, until this achieved, ISA does not support APRA's proposal for alignment between the information registrable superannuation entity (RSE) licensees are required to disclose in PDSs under the Corporations Regulations, as modified by ASIC, and the information required to be reported under APRA's reporting standards," the ISA submission said.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.