Regulatory barriers seen eroding returns and limiting super investment

20 November 2025
| By Adrian Suljanovic |
image
image image
expand image

A new report has highlighted regulatory settings restricting super funds and reducing potential retirement balances for millions of Australians.

The Australian Investment Council (AIC) has urged the Government to widen its review of superannuation settings, warning that existing rules under Regulatory Guide 97 and the Your Future, Your Super (YFYS) performance test have discouraged funds from investing in start-ups and growth companies, ultimately reducing member outcomes.

New research by Mandala, commissioned by the Council, found that removing these barriers could leave young Australians up to $20,300 better off in retirement.

Private Capital: Australia’s Untapped Opportunity shows that start-ups and growth companies accessed through private equity and venture capital funds have delivered average post-fee returns of around 18.2 per cent, roughly 11 percentage points above listed assets in Australia.

Despite this, domestic superannuation funds allocate just 4.4 per cent on average to private equity and venture capital within default MySuper products.

The report further found that an additional $54 billion could be invested in these asset classes to maximise net returns and bring Australian funds into closer alignment with global pension peers, which on average allocate 10 percentage points more to start-ups and growth companies.

Mandala’s analysis also estimated that underinvestment in private equity and venture capital is costing up to 140,000 additional jobs across the Australian economy.

Moreover, the report pointed to fee disclosure rules under ASIC’s RG 97 and the design of the YFYS performance test as key contributors to the under-allocation.

Although higher exposure to private equity and venture capital would likely improve long-term member returns, the analysis revealed funds would be more likely to fail the YFYS test, which evaluates how closely returns track a benchmark rather than risk-adjusted performance.

The Council argued that transparency measures and performance benchmarks should shift toward net returns to better reflect member interests.

“We need to move the system away from a cheapest is best framework to one that delivers more money into workers’ pockets when they retire,” Australian Investment Council CEO Navleen Prasad said.

“At the same time, the potential is there to grow the pool of capital available for Australian start-ups and growth companies by $54 billion and support an additional 140,000 Australian jobs.”

“It’s rare to have such a high-impact opportunity to improve retirement outcomes at no cost to the employers, employees, or Government. Addressing the regulatory barnacles that are short-changing Australian workers should be a no-brainer.”

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 10 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 11 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 11 months ago

The fund has launched a new campaign after finding many older tradies have lacked confidence understanding entitlements and missed pension income....

40 minutes 14 seconds ago

Unions and the Opposition have raised fresh concerns about APRA and ASIC’s failures amid fallout from First Guardian and Shield....

53 minutes 19 seconds ago

UniSuper chief investment officer, John Pearce, has shared his thinking behind why the $158 billion superannuation fund is yet to invest in cryptocurrency....

1 hour ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND