Superannuation statements should replace annual balances with an estimate of annual retirment income as the headline figure provided to members to remind them of the purpose of their fund and its long term goal according to an industry consultant and academic.
Macquarie Applied Finance Centre honorary fellow Peter Vann said fund performance and annual balances are a backward looking, point in time result that are ineffective in providing an actual picture of a member's retirement income.
According to Vann member balances are a distraction from the purpose of superannuation — to provide a retirement income stream — and may be obscuring action that would lead to a higher final retirement income in the fund.
"Superannuation balances appear to most fund members as money they can't access and are focused on returns but not on where the member may be heading in retirement," Vann said.
"If super funds produced member reports with an estimate of annual retirement income based on that balance most members would understand that idea better than the current annual reports. They already receive a regular pay-check from their employer and super statements could reflect that approach of ‘how much will I have in the hand each week?'."
Vann said the shift would not require high levels of financial literacy or education but "would have powerful consequences that created greater engagement by fund members before retirement in address retirement income adequacy".
He said fund members would be faced with saving more, retiring later or changing their investment strategy which opened up the potential for financial planning advice.
"It sounds like a paradigm shift but this is not a new idea and is something that should have been done 20 years ago when the move began from defined benefit to defined contribution funds," Vann said.
"An estimates approach allows members and their advisers to model returns and volatility in different asset classes during real market conditions and aims for long term outcomes based in the future and not short term fixed past returns."
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.