POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Reserving stipulations could stymie mergers
|
Forcing super funds to hold certain levels of capital reserves could stymie future mergers between funds with different reserve balances, according to managing director of Towers Watson Andrew Boal.
Speaking at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia briefing in Melbourne last week, Boal suggested that dictating a compulsory level of capital reserves could become a stumbling block to future fund mergers as members of a fund with greater reserves try to prevent the other fund from gaining access to those reserves in case of investment loss.
“I can see this situation coming through in our industry, [that] if one fund has a reserve of 1.3 per cent of assets, and other fund has a reserve of 0.2 per cent of assets, the members [can say]: ‘If we merge, I don’t want those members to have access to my reserve’,” Boal said.
“So that can actually start to become a bit of a roadblock to mergers or complications down the track of how reserves get used, post-merger environment,” he added.
Such a situation had already arisen with corporate super funds, Boal said.
While he was in favour of the Cooper Review’s recommendations of risk reserves being established and being used by fund members, talking about a minimum and maximum level of reserves was “a little strange”, Boal said.
“Reserves are there to be built up, and when you have an incident you use them. So I can foresee situations where the reserve will be run back down to zero, and then you start again. That’s the nature of reserving,” he said.
Recommended for you
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
53.24 3 y p.a(%)
3
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
43.15 3 y p.a(%)
4
DomaCom Shoreline North Coogee
36.26 3 y p.a(%)
5
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
35.87 3 y p.a(%)
