Resolve conflicts of interests say funds

29 September 2005
| By Mike |

Some of Australia’s largest companies conducted almost $6 billion in director-related business, prompting calls from major superannuation funds for company directors to better manage conflicts of interest.

The $6 billion figure emerged from research funded by six public sector superannuation funds, a spokesperson for which warned that even the perception of conflicts of interest could jeopardise investor confidence.

The research was funded by the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme, the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme, the Northern Territory Government Public Authorities Superannuation Scheme, the Catholic Superannuation Scheme, VicSuper Emergency Services Superannuation Scheme

Speaking on behalf of the fund, the chief investment officer of Catholic Superannuation said members investing their superannuation savings with Australian companies depended on company directors’ independent judgement and business skills to help safeguard their retirement savings.

“It is not about prohibiting directors from having related interests,” he said. “It is about disclosing those interests to ensure that any transactions are clearly in the interests of shareowners and not directors.”

The research revealed that of 160 companies on the ASX200, many risked not meeting investors’ expectations on good governance.

It found that:

* Transactions with director-related entities by 48 companies were either insufficiently disclosed, not disclosed at all or of a size that would create suspicion that a conflict of interest had occurred

* Goods and services transactions between a company and a director-related entity when the director is a substantial shareholder of the listed company represented one-third of all related party transactions

* 168 of the 958 company directors included in the research served on two or more boards of the S&P/ASX200 companies.

The head of BT Financial Group’s Governance Advisory Service, Erik Mather said it was in the interest of every company to proactively manage conflicts, or run the risk of generating a regulatory response that would severely diminish the pool of available director talent.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 8 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 8 months ago

Australia’s superannuation sector has expanded strongly over the June quarter, with assets, contributions, and benefit payments all recording notable increases....

2 hours 40 minutes ago

The Super Members Council (SMC) has called on the government to urgently legislate payday super, warning that delays will further undermine the retirement savings of Aust...

2 hours 55 minutes ago

ASFA has highlighted that regulation should not be “set and forget” and calls for a modernised test to meet future needs....

3 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3