Restore LRBA ban says ASFA

The Federal Government should use the May Budget to restore the general prohibition on direct borrowing by superannuation funds, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In doing so, ASFA has pointed to an almost exponential increase in the amount of funds borrowed leveraging Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements (LBRAs).

The ASFA has used its pre-Budget submission to point out that it has had a long-standing policy of opposing borrowing by superannuation funds and that the ban was something which was supported by the Financial System Inquiry (FSI).

Related News:

“… the use of LRBAs by superannuation funds is not appropriate,” the submission said.

“The amount of funds borrowed using LRBAs has increased substantially, from $497 million in June 2009 to $25.4 billion in June 2016, an increase of around 5,000 per cent,” the ASFA submission said.

“Borrowing, even with LRBAs, magnifies the gains and losses from fluctuations in the prices of assets held in funds, and increases the probability of large losses within a fund. This puts individuals’ superannuation at risk,” it said.

Related Content

SCC welcomes funding injection from ASIC EU

The Superannuation Consumers’ Centre (SCC) has welcomed a funding injection stemming from regulatory action, after ANZ and the Commonwealth Bank agr...Read more

Has Govt opened way for ‘gaming’ of super fees?

There is a danger that superannuation fund members could “game” the Federal Government’s latest Budget changes capping fees on low-balance super...Read more

APRA’s ‘inherent tension’ question

The ability of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to maintain stability in the superannuation industry may be at odds with its abil...Read more




Broadly i agree with the philosophy of not attracting greater risk to retirement monies, but with the continual contraction of concessional and non concessional caps, this might be the last resort for those attempting to get greater balances into superannuation. perhaps the level of borrowing (LVR) might be easier to restrict moving forward rather than to knock LRBA out fully

Add new comment