The Government has released its retirement income covenant position paper for consultation.
It said the covenant would codify the requirements and obligations for superannuation trustees to improve retirement outcomes for individuals, while enabling choice and competition in the retirement phase.
The paper outlined the fundamental obligations of trustees to formulate, review regularly, and give effect to a retirement income strategy.
The strategy, it said, would be a strategic document developed by the trustee to outline their plan to assist their members to achieve and balance objectives which were:
“Requiring trustees to have a retirement income strategy ensures that they identify and recognise the retirement income needs of the members of their fund and have a plan to build the fund’s capacity and capability to service those needs,” the paper said.
“The strategy should reflect a trustee’s broad understanding of their membership, either for the members of the fund as a whole or for cohorts of members. The characteristics of these cohorts are at the discretion of trustees but could be determined by factors such as superannuation balance, home ownership status, partnered status, or age of retirement.”
The paper outlined a summary of obligations and discretions of trustees that included:
The Government said it would consult further on exposure draft legislation later this year. Subject to the passage of legislation, this covenant would commence from 1 July, 2022.
The consultation of the paper would close on 6 August, 2021.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.