While strongly supportive of the Government’s proposals overall, robo-adviser SuperEd has expressed some strong reservations about Treasury’s Retirement Income Covenant.
According to SuperEd chairman and co-founder Jeremy Duffield, there were two key questions the government failed to address in its proposals.
Firstly, Duffield asked if a member in a comprehensive income product for retirement (CIPR) would be exempt from minimum withdrawal requirements. While not explicitly stated in the paper, he said SuperEd believed this should be the case.
Secondly, Duffield asked what the trigger event for a CIPR offering would be, that is, either the member stating their intention to retire and meeting the conditions of release, or something else.
Duffield said Treasury’s proposal recommended what SuperEd believed were “workable and sensible” default retirement income solutions under the rubric of CIPRs.
However, it was concerned that the narrow bands recommended by Treasury were unrealistic as they did not adequately appreciate the volatility of investment markets through changing economic regimes likely to be encountered in a retirement spanning 20 to 40 years.
"The requirement to have an expectation that the constant income stream will endure until age 105 also encourages conservative payout streams, which is not consistent with the intent to facilitate higher income drawdowns and to avoid legacy benefits," Duffield said.
"More generally, we are concerned about whether realistic expectations are being created for CIPRs, particularly in the current low interest rate/expected return environment, which makes providing high sustainable retirement incomes very challenging."
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.