The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry has confirmed that it will begin its superannuation-focused hearings in Melbourne on 6 August.
The Royal Commission sent formal notification of the Round 5 hearings today but has not yet detailed who is listed to appear.
However, letters sent by the Royal Commission to superannuation funds suggest fund executives and directors will, amongst other things, have to explain to the Royal Commission their travel and accommodation expenses over the past five years together with how those expenditures benefited members.
Correspondence received by superannuation funds and sighted by Super Review has confirmed the Royal Commission has requested highly specific information about administration expenses.
The information being sought by the Royal Commission will succeed in having funds reveal not only what they pay their most senior executives but also what has been spent by those executives in terms of travel and entertainment.
Included in the range of expenses specified in the Royal Commission documentation are “entertainment, accommodation, airfares and taxis and parking”.
The Royal Commission has also sought information on marketing expenses “including brand development, sponsorships, advertising, or other marketing for the purpose of recruitment or member retention”.
Where marketing expenses are concerned, the Royal Commission has sought details of service providers over the past five years, together with “the process by which marketing expenses are approved and which individuals have authority to approve such expenses”.
It then asks the funds to “set out the process by which the benefits or returns obtained in relation to marketing expenses are assessed, including any auditing, benchmarking or other appraisals to assess the value of such expenditure and the performance of the relevant service provider”.
The Royal Commission documentation then asks the funds to explain how the expenditures satisfied the so-called sole-purpose test within the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act and with respect to whether they were in the best interests of members.
ASFA has urged greater transparency and fairness in the way superannuation levies are set and spent.
Labor’s re-election has reignited calls to strengthen Australia’s $4.2 trillion super system, with industry bodies urging swift reform amid economic and demographic shifts.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.