A panel has questioned whether MyRetirement products need a safe harbour option if the current suggested framework is opt-in by both the trustee and superannuation fund member.
Speaking on a panel at the Financial Services Council (FSC) Leaders Summit on Wednesday, UniSuper independent director, Nicolette Rubinsztein said there were mixed views on having a safe harbour option for comprehensive income products in retirement (CIPRs).
“If you go with the safe harbour option it requires you to be very prescriptive. And then we would have wrapped ourselves in knots with a safe harbour option as you don’t want that level of prescription because we want more flexibility in trustees,” she said.
“If we do have one we need to go back to a principles-based approach. If we do have one, it would be more around the process rather than your product needs to look like ‘x’.”
Rubinsztein also noted that ultimately the MyRetirement product would have to be mandatory for trustees in the future.
“There will be a need to reframe it. There should be a period where it is optional but we will have to go through a lot of evolution,” she said.
“We also need to allow for a way of applying for an exemption for where it doesn’t make sense for a fund to need a longevity product as there will be cases where it’s not going to make sense.
“CIPRs should be framed as compulsory but funds should be allowed to apply for an exemption rather than it being an option.”
Also speaking on the panel, NAB general manager for corporate super, Lara Bourguignon, said there should not be one mandatory CIPR that all funds needed.
“The framework does need to have certain components where things are mandatory but we need to make sure we get it right so we don’t stifle innovation and put people into the wrong solution,” she said.
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.