Scale for super survival is a myth

20 January 2015
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Small scale superannuation funds are not destined to disappear and can survive by offering specialist investments while funds that gain scale may see performance drop away as efficiency gains plateau and risk positions are reduced.

In a recently released research paper Brookvine executive director Jack Gray stated the idea that benefits of scale were so substantial and small fund returns were too poor to guarantee their survival was "a prevailing superannuation belief-myth" not supported by research or reality.

Gray stated while scale benefits accrued in process driven areas such as administration and custody there were limits at which point decreasing returns to scale woud push net marginal efficiency gains to zero.

He also stated that scale benefits in investments were mixed with SuperRatings data showing a strong negative correlation between the size and performance of funds over 5 and 7 years while other research showed the opposite with Gray stating this often was the result of better direct internal management of the fund assets.

"Depending on the strategy, diseconomies of scale in active listed equities can occur relatively quickly, probably around $6 billion for a ‘standard' broad-based Australian equities strategy, and perhaps as low as $500 million for some specialised concentrated long-short strategies," Gray said.

"As managers' FUM grow, driven by an all too common identification of size with power and influence and encouraged by asset-based fees, performance tends to fall as a result of greater market impact and of managers protecting their reputation and business by increasing the number of holdings and by decreasing risk."

Gray said smaller super funds can avoid the need for scale and still survive by targeting "investment opportunities left on the table by large funds" in areas of capacity-constrained strategies not available to larger super funds

He said smaller super funds would have a different business exposure and offering than "the mass of look-alike competitors" and could be "re-positioned as the innovative higher growth fund exposed to genuinely different risks, a super fund that's resisting the imperative to become a marketing and distribution machine at the expense of investing".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 5 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Private market assets in super have surged, while private debt recorded the fastest growth among all investment types....

3 hours ago

The equities investor has launched a new long-short fund seeded by UniSuper, targeting alpha from ASX 300 equities using AI insights....

3 hours ago

The fund has strengthened efforts to boost gender diversity, targeting 40:40:20 balance across its investment teams by 2030....

3 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3