Superannuation Funds which find themselves on the losing end of a Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) decision will need to calculate the interest payable to affected members at the earnings rate of their fund over the period in question.
That is the effect of a recent decision of the SCT in dealing with a death benefit nomination dispute which saw the issue left unresolved for more than two years.
The superannuation fund at the centre of the dispute, perhaps foreseeing that its decision as to the disposition of the death benefit would be overturned by the Tribunal asked that any interest payable should be determined at the prevailing Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) cash rate.
However, as noted by the presiding member, Noel Davis, the superannuation fund did not give any reasons for suggesting the RBA cash rate.
In his SCT findings on the issue, Davis said that in the opinion of the Tribunal, "the appropriate rate of interest is the earning rate that the amount of the death benefit has earned in the Fund up to the date on which the benefit is paid".
His determination said this represented the amount of the earnings in the Fund that "the amount of the death benefit has generated in the long period since the death of the Deceased Member".
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
I'm pleased to hear that Noel will be happy for funds to apply negative investment returns to "settlements"!!!