![]() |
Some superannuation funds appear to have been jeopardising the ability of fund members to make appeals to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) about death benefits decisions by improperly dating letters.
The SCT has used its latest quarterly bulletin to state that it had received death benefits complaints where it had been discovered that letters relating to the distribution of death benefits had been issued and posted well after the date actually written on the letters.
Pointing out that the SCT has 28 days’ to establish jurisdiction in such matters, the tribunal’s bulletin said it was relying on the Acts Interpretation Act to determine the status of some correspondence.
It said because strict time limits on the making of complaints to the tribunal were prescribed, trustees and their administrators needed to have procedures in place to ensure that correspondence relating to death benefit distribution decisions were issued or posted on the date on the letters, or the following date at the latest.
“A simple way for trustees to avoid problems of mail delivery is to send all notices to potential beneficiaries by registered mail,” the bulletin said.
Large superannuation accounts may need to find funds outside their accounts or take the extreme step of selling non-liquid assets under the proposed $3 million super tax legislation, according to new analysis from ANU.
Economists have been left scrambling to recalibrate after the Reserve Bank wrong-footed markets on Tuesday, holding the cash rate steady despite widespread expectations of a cut.
A new Roy Morgan report has found retail super funds had the largest increase in customer satisfaction in the last year, but its record-high rating still lags other super categories.
In a sharp rebuke to market expectations, the Reserve Bank held the cash rate steady at 3.85 per cent on Tuesday, defying near-unanimous forecasts of a cut and signalling a more cautious approach to further easing.