Establishing a SMSF may be simple but trustees need to understand the rules if they intend moving offshore, writes Paul Sarkis.
Trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) who are moving overseas for an extended period need to be aware of the rules that determine the fund’s residency status and the associated tax implications.
Only funds that meet the definition of ‘Australian superannuation fund’ (ASF) are eligible for concessional tax treatment. This definition will be met if:
In TR2008/9, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) provided detailed guidance on meeting these tests.
A SMSF is established in Australia when the initial contribution is paid to and accepted by the trustee(s) in Australia. It’s not necessary for the trust deed to be signed and executed in Australia.
If the fund was not established in Australia, it will satisfy the test if at least one fund asset is situated in Australia at the relevant time.
The central management and control (CMC) of a fund involves a focus on the who, when and where of the key strategic decision making processes and activities of the fund. These include:
Activities that form part of the fund’s day-to-day operations (eg, the acceptance of contributions) do not generally constitute CMC.
In some situations, a fund’s CMC may be outside Australia for a period of time. In general, the fund will still meet the ‘ordinarily’ requirement if its CMC is temporarily outside Australia for up to two years.
Furthermore, the fund can still meet this requirement even if the CMC is temporarily outside Australia for more than two years. However, if the CMC is permanently outside Australia for any period, this requirement will not be met.
To comply with the CMC test, non resident trustees are able to appoint a power of attorney who is an Australian resident to make key strategic decisions.
The fund’s trust deed should allow for such a delegation of authority and the attorney must make the strategic decisions independently of the fund trustees.
Elizabeth and Edward are members and trustees of their SMSF. Their trust deed allows for the delegation of trustee duties. They move to England indefinitely to manage a business and sell their Australian home.
While overseas they decide to delegate their trustee duties (such as altering the fund’s investment strategy) to Elizabeth’s sister, Mary, who is an Australian resident. Mary undertakes these activities without referring to Elizabeth or Edward.
In this case, CMC continues to be ‘ordinarily in Australia’ at all times. If, however, Mary sought their permission to undertake her delegated duties, the CMC is not ‘ordinarily in Australia’ as it is exercised from overseas.
This test is satisfied if, at the relevant time:
A member is considered active if they contribute to the fund or contributions are made on their behalf. A member is not considered active if:
Karen is a member of a two-member fund that meets the first two tests. The fund's assets are split equally among the members. She goes overseas for 18 months and ceases to be an Australian resident. She doesn’t make any super contributions while overseas and no contributions are made on her behalf.
The remaining member remains an Australian resident and continues to receive super contributions. Since at least 50 per cent of the assets are attributable to active members, the third test is also met.
If the SMSF is likely to fail the ASF definition, trustees could consider:
If the fund does not meet these tests, the total assets (less non-concessional contributions) may be taxed at 45 per cent. The fund may also lose tax concessions in future years.
Moving overseas will not necessarily mean the SMSF needs to be wound up. With careful planning, the fund can remain an ASF. However, trustees should seek professional advice before a member goes overseas permanently or temporarily for two years or more.
Paul Sarkis is head of technical services at MLC.
ASFA has urged greater transparency and fairness in the way superannuation levies are set and spent.
Labor’s re-election has reignited calls to strengthen Australia’s $4.2 trillion super system, with industry bodies urging swift reform amid economic and demographic shifts.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.