How to hire and retain staff is the big question for superannuation funds to solve when it comes to internalisation of investment management, according to a panel.
Speaking at the Australian Superannuation Investment conference, held by the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) in the Gold Coast, a panel discussed the struggles when hiring investment employees.
There had been a trend in the space recently for super funds to bring their investment in-house as a way to cut down costs compared to external management.
Ken Marshman, chairman of Rest, said: “Retaining staff is the big question of internalisation because funds can get the OK to pay $1 million for an external manager but can you pay that when you bring it in-house or what does that say about the culture of the organisation? This is a major sleeping issue and we have to be careful if we are heading in that direction. This is a big issue”.
However, Philip Moffitt, board director at Aware Super, disputed this and said the idea that there was a supply shortage for talented staff was a myth. The solution, he said, was to provide a value proposition which would attract staff beyond just the salary.
“Everyone wants to think there is a shortage but that’s not the case. Aware has been hiring a lot of people and it hasn’t been as difficult as we thought.
“Your value proposition has to be very clear, highlight that they can work across asset classes, unlike at a fund manager, and that they can work with the best global managers.”
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.