POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super fund censured for delayed SMSF rollover
A superannuation fund which took too long to transfer a member’s income stream account balance to his self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) has been warned of its behaviour by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) and ordered to compensate him for lost investment earnings.
The SCT made clear in a determination issued late last year (D18-19\042) that superannuation funds needed to clearly communicate the processes involved in making transfers to SMSFs and not unduly delay. The SCT redacts the names of both the superannuation funds and the members who make the complaints.
The rollover request was made in July, 2016 but not completed till mid-October.
The problem arose when the superannuation fund member sought to rollover the balance of his income stream account with the fund to his SMSF in July, 2016, with the member being asked to supply proof of the Australian Business Number (ABN) of his SMSF and proof of his identity.
However, the superannuation fund then claimed it could not match the information provided with the AUSkey system administered by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and so could not verify he was a member of the SMSF.
He was advised by a phone consultant on 4 August, 2016 to contact the ATO to adjust the system and then contact the superannuation fund so that the rollover could be treated as a priority, but the SCT noted that it was the regulatory responsibility of the superannuation fund itself to contact the ATO within five working days.
The SCT said it was of the opinion that it was unacceptable of superannuation fund not to ensure it had initiated contact with the ATO as per its business rules to ensure it could rollover the complainant’s benefit to the SMSF and then to take no action concerning the rollover after the 4 August, 2016 telephone call.
“Therefore, in all the circumstances, the Tribunal was satisfied that the Trustee could have processed the Complainant’s rollover by 9 August 2016, being three business days after the date that Trustee could reasonably have had ATO approval to process the Complainant’s rollover if it had followed SIS Regulation 6.33E and contacted the ATO to verify the Complainant’s information,” the determination said.
The superannuation fund was ordered to pay the member an amount equal to his income stream account balance calculated at 9 August, 2016, plus interest at six per cent for the period 16 August, 2016 to 19 October, 2016.
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
