POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super fund size not a predictor of performance: Frontier
Super funds’ asset allocation is a more influential element on their performance than their size or scale, research by Frontier Investment Consulting concludes.
Frontier’s analysis noted that some of the best performing super funds across the 2020/202 financial year were among the smallest names in the industry, with seven of last year’s top performers managing less than $30 billion and five of these running less than $15 billion.
With the first half of the period being market by positive performance and the second by negative, Frontier’s analysis showed funds needed to do well in both to appear at the top of the performance tables.
“Funds with a larger allocation to unlisted assets typically performed best,” the research said. “The impact of periodic valuations of unlisted assets has helped portfolios hold up during the ‘risk-off’ sentiment of the last 12 months. This was a much stronger determinant of outcomes than fund size.”
Frontier highlighted First Super and MIESF as two of the ‘smaller’ super funds that outperformed their larger peers more recently. Both posted positive returns over the 12 months under review, during which time the median return for the industry was a loss of around 3%.
However, the group added that the correlation between size and poor performance appears to hold up more when the worst performers are looked at. All of the weakest performers in the analysis have assets under $5 billion.
Looking over 10-year, Frontier said there was a stronger correlation between size and returns.
“While it is clear 10 years is a more meaningful time period to review fund performance, what is not clear is whether larger funds have better performance because they are large or whether they are large because they have better performance,”, Frontier said.
“Just as not all small funds underperform, not all large funds are at the top of the performance charts.”
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
53.24 3 y p.a(%)
3
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
43.15 3 y p.a(%)
4
DomaCom Shoreline North Coogee
36.26 3 y p.a(%)
5
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
35.87 3 y p.a(%)
