POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super funds increase AGM votes against directors
Super funds increased the instances they voted against a director by 7% in 2019, according to an annual general meeting (AGM) report by Link Group.
In its AGM Snapshot 2019, Link analysed the results of 1,800 meetings for voting patterns.
It said director scrutiny remained an issue with “directors under the microscope more than in previous years’ over issues such as director independence, over-boarding and governance and risk failures”.
“Director scrutiny continued in 2019, with directors under the microscope more than in previous years. More resolutions received votes against director elections/re-elections when compared to 2018. Areas of concern related to directors were the independence of directors and the composition of boards as a result, overboarding and material governance and risk failures,” Link said.
“[Some] 47 director elections received more than 20% against votes. Overall we saw super funds increase they voted against a director nomination by 7%.”
Link said it had seen an increase was particularly prevalent at companies which had reported poor financial results or governance issues and even if a director’ other entities were struggling.
“The recent AGM season has also shown that investors are willing to extend their ‘against’ votes to organisations which are not necessarily the target of the ‘against’ vote – in that if directors are also directors of entities which are in the spotlight for the wrong reasons, some investors have shown a willingness to vote against a director’s re-election at entities which are not experiencing issues.
“There were a number of protest votes against director re-elections, specifically where the director was long-standing, part of the board in place at the time of the poor performance and potentially had the ability to influence and approve certain outcomes or at least should have been aware of certain issues during that time.”
They were also requesting more information from directors before they would re-elect them, a change from previous times when re-election was usually automatic and received unanimous votes.
“We observed at a number of meetings, investors requesting directors subject to re-election address the meeting and outline the benefits and attributes they would bring to the board composition as well as an increase of questions asked by investors in regards to director re-elections.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
