Using centralised portfolio management (CPM) for superannuation funds looking to merge could allow the funds to find their “scale dividends”, according to Parametric Portfolio.
Parametric said merging funds needed to deliver investment solutions that better matched the needs and preferences of fund members at the right cost. Funds that failed to do this would be meagre, and members could face more limited, ill-fitting options that simply passed on returns and culture dilution, and at worst “mission drift” could substitute super funds as the neo-bank conglomerates of the future.
Parametric head of research, Australia and New Zealand, Raewyn Williams, said CPM used the best ideas of each super fund’s individual funds managers and managed them in a single live portfolio that removed tax and trading inefficiencies.
She said the benefits of this process included:
“In our view using CPM will allow them to move to the implementation phase of the investment rationalisation project with a detailed understanding of the expected portfolio holdings, risks, fees, tax positions, environmental, social, and governance, and other sensitive attributes of the newly designed, rationalised portfolio,” Williams said.
She noted the bigger the potential investment changes, the more the value of a CPM structure and best-of-breed implementation came to the fore.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.