Australia's major superannuation funds now rival the major banks in assets and influence on savings and should therefore be treated as such from a regulatory perspective, according to a senior Federal Opposition spokesman, Tasmanian Liberal Senator, David Bushby.
Bushby used a recent address to claim that despite superannuation funds growing to stand alongside the major banks, funds continued to enjoy significant regulatory advantages.
At the same time, Bushby signaled that this was something that was likely to be addressed by a future Coalition Government via a broader review of the financial services sector undertaken in a similar vein to the Wallis Review.
"During the 15 years of post-Wallis finance sector operations, there has been very substantial growth in the industry superannuation funds and self-managed super funds — and post the Rudd/Gillard reforms, the great bulk of Superannuation Guarantee funds have flowed into these two areas with little competitive pressures, via Fair Work Australia mandates," he said.
"The large super funds now rival the major banks in assets and influence on savings and investments — yet they enjoy significant regulatory competitive advantages when it comes to capital requirements and disclosure," Bushby said.
"As they are such an increasingly important part of our financial system, it is vital that a big picture analysis of that system considers how super funds should fit into the regulatory framework in the best interests of all Australians."
The two funds have announced the signing of a non-binding MOU to explore a potential merger.
The board must shift its focus from managing inflation to stimulating the economy with the trimmed mean inflation figure edging closer to the 2.5 per cent target, economists have said.
ASIC chair Joe Longo says superannuation trustees must do more to protect members from misconduct and high-risk schemes.
Super fund mergers are rising, but poor planning during successor fund transfers has left members and employers exposed to serious risks.