Capacity restrictions implemented by fund managers are constraining the level of investment from super funds which rely on external managers, according to AustralianSuper head of equities Innes McKeand.
At a Deloitte breakfast in Melbourne, McKeand said that capacity issues impacted a fund more strongly the bigger it got, because external fund managers are unwilling to let their businesses be dominated by one client.
Super funds would need to source further fund managers to invest; however, similar capacity constraints led to long lists of fund managers, he said. The external fund managers that AustralianSuper worked with had limited the amount of capacity AustralianSuper could work with in order to manage their own resulting business risk, according to McKeand.
"Their behaviour was on their agenda, and not necessarily on ours," McKeand said.
The net result of all those managers would be flat/neutral and funds would still pay active management fees for the privilege, he said.
However, internalising assets allowed funds to break free of that, he said.
AustralianSuper will be paying $500 million in fees to external managers when it reaches $100 billion assets under management, McKeand said.
Gross performance with internal funds is just as good as external funds, while net returns are also better, he said.
Super funds with internal management will also have the benefits of lower costs, greater insight and be smarter investors all-round, he said, while internal management would also better align with members' interests.
Private market assets in super have surged, while private debt recorded the fastest growth among all investment types.
The equities investor has launched a new long-short fund seeded by UniSuper, targeting alpha from ASX 300 equities using AI insights.
The fund has strengthened efforts to boost gender diversity, targeting 40:40:20 balance across its investment teams by 2030.
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.